BCRC Strain Collection Catalog & Shopping Cart

  Home / BCRC Content / 80192 / 

Return

  Taxonomy Citation

The information shown in this page was generated using the cross-referenced linkage within public domain database between their strains and BCRC related strains. Usually the information provided from public domain databases varies with different confidences and errors, BCRC provides the related information here at best effort, but BCRC doesn't take the responsibility about the correctness of the information provided here.

Taxonomy Citation ID Reference
51818 Validation List No. 177: "List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published." Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. (2017) 67:3140-3143.
25047 Aizawa  T, Bao Ve  N, Vijarnsorn  P, Nakajima  M, Sunairi  M,     ( 2010 )

Burkholderia acidipaludis sp. nov., aluminum-tolerant bacteria isolated from Chinese water chestnut (Eleocharis dulcis) growing in highly acidic swamps in South-East Asia.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 60 (Pt 9)
PMID : 19819996 DOI  :   10.1099/ijs.0.018283-0    
Abstract >>
Two strains of aluminium-tolerant bacteria, SA33(T) and 7A078, were isolated from Chinese water chestnut (Eleocharis dulcis) growing in highly acidic swamps (pH 2-4) in actual acid sulfate soil areas of Vietnam (SA33(T)) and Thailand (7A078). The strains were Gram-negative, aerobic, non-spore-forming rods, 0.6-0.7 mum wide and 1.3-1.7 mum long. These strains showed good growth at pH 3.0-8.0 and 17-37 degrees C. The organisms contained ubiquinone Q-8 as the predominant isoprenoid quinone and C(16 : 0), C(18 : 1) �s 7c and C(17 : 0) cyclo as the major fatty acids. Their fatty acid profiles were similar to those reported for other Burkholderia species. The DNA G+C content of these strains was 64 mol%. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, the strains were shown to belong to the genus Burkholderia. Although the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values calculated for strain SA33(T) to 7A078 and the type strains of Burkholderia kururiensis, B. sacchari and B. tuberum were 100, 97.3, 97.1 and 97.0 %, respectively, strains SA33(T) and 7A078 formed a group that was distinct in the phylogenetic trees; the DNA-DNA relatedness of strain SA33(T) to 7A078 and these three type strains were respectively 90, 47, 46 and 45 %. The results of physiological and biochemical tests, including whole-cell protein pattern analysis, allowed phenotypic differentiation of these strains from described Burkholderia species. Therefore, strains SA33(T) and 7A078 represent a novel species, for which the name Burkholderia acidipaludis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SA33(T) (=NBRC 101816(T) =VTCC-D6-6(T)). Strain 7A078 (=NBRC 103872 =BCC 36999) is a reference strain.
KeywordMeSH Terms
45719 Sawana  A, Adeolu  M, Gupta  RS,     ( 2014 )

Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species.

Frontiers in genetics 5 (N/A)
PMID : 25566316 DOI  :   10.3389/fgene.2014.00429     PMC  :   PMC4271702    
Abstract >>
The genus Burkholderia contains large number of diverse species which include many clinically important organisms, phytopathogens, as well as environmental species. However, currently, there is a paucity of biochemical or molecular characteristics which can reliably distinguish different groups of Burkholderia species. We report here the results of detailed phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses of 45 sequenced species of the genus Burkholderia. In phylogenetic trees based upon concatenated sequences for 21 conserved proteins as well as 16S rRNA gene sequence based trees, members of the genus Burkholderia grouped into two major clades. Within these main clades a number of smaller clades including those corresponding to the clinically important Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) and the Burkholderia pseudomallei groups were also clearly distinguished. Our comparative analysis of protein sequences from Burkholderia spp. has identified 42 highly specific molecular markers in the form of conserved sequence indels (CSIs) that are uniquely found in a number of well-defined groups of Burkholderia spp. Six of these CSIs are specific for a group of Burkholderia spp. (referred to as Clade I in this work) which contains all clinically relevant members of the genus (viz. the BCC and the B. pseudomallei group) as well as the phytopathogenic Burkholderia spp. The second main clade (Clade II), which is composed of environmental Burkholderia species, is also distinguished by 2 identified CSIs that are specific for this group. Additionally, our work has also identified multiple CSIs that serve to clearly demarcate a number of smaller groups of Burkholderia spp. including 3 CSIs that are specific for the B. cepacia complex, 4 CSIs that are uniquely found in the B. pseudomallei group, 5 CSIs that are specific for the phytopathogenic Burkholderia spp. and 22 other CSI that distinguish two groups within Clade II. The described molecular markers provide highly specific means for the demarcation of different groups of Burkholderia spp. and they also offer novel and useful targets for the development of diagnostic assays for the clinically important members of the BCC or the pseudomallei groups. Based upon the results of phylogenetic analyses, the identified CSIs and the pathogenicity profile of Burkholderia species, we are proposing a division of the genus Burkholderia into two genera. In this new proposal, the emended genus Burkholderia will correspond to the Clade I and it will contain only the clinically relevant and phytopathogenic Burkholderia species. All other Burkholderia spp., which are primarily environmental, will be transferred to a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov.
KeywordMeSH Terms
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees
Burkholderia
Burkholderia cepacia complex
conserved signature indels
molecular signatures
phylogenetic trees

331, Shih-Pin Rd., Hsinchu 30062, Taiwan

Phone: +886-3-5223191

E-mail: bcrcweb@firdi.org.tw

web maintainance: +886-3-5223191 ext 593

Copyright © 2018.BCRC All rights reserved.The duplication or use of information and data such as texts or images or any linkage the website at the "bcrc.firdi.org.tw" is only permitted with the indication of the source or with prior approval by the BCRC(Bioresource Collection and Research Center).