| Taxonomy Citation ID | Reference |
|---|---|
| 22039 | Murray, E.G.D., Webb, A.A., and Swann, M.B.R. "A disease of rabbits characterized by a large mononuclear leucocytosis caused by a hitherto underscribed bacillus Bacterium monocytogenes n. sp." J. Pathol. Bacteriol. (1926) 29: 407-439. [No PubMed record available.] |
| 2759 | Skerman, V.B.D., McGowan, V., and Sneath, P.H.A. (editors). "Approved lists of bacterial names." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1980) 30:225-420. [No PubMed record available.] | 22040 |
Pirie JH,
( 1940 ) THE GENUS LISTERELLA PIRIE. PMID : 17773427 DOI : 10.1126/science.91.2364.383 Abstract >>
N/A
|
3667 |
Kathariou S,
Pine L,
( 1991 ) The type strain(s) of Listeria monocytogenes: a source of continuing difficulties. PMID : 1906732 DOI : 10.1099/00207713-41-2-328 Abstract >>
The type strain of Listeria monocytogenes differs from wild-type L. monocytogenes strains in more characteristics than just the previously reported deficiency in hemolytic activity and virulence in the murine infection model. The type strain from the American Type Culture Collection (strain ATCC 15313) produces lecithinase, is hemolytic on rabbit (but not sheep) blood agar, lacks motility, and shows limited cytopathogenic effects on Caco-2 monolayers, whereas the type strain from the Special Listeria Culture Collection (strain SLCC 53) is unable to produce lecithinase, is nonhemolytic on rabbit or sheep blood agar, is motile, and shows no cytopathogenic effects on Caco-2 monolayers.
|
9438 |
( 1996 ) Taxonomic note: a proposal for reviewing the interpretation of the CAMP reaction between Listeria monocytogenes and Rhodococcus equi. PMID : 8782698 DOI : 10.1099/00207713-46-3-832 Abstract >>
The discrepancies between the current description of the CAMP test between Listeria monocytogenes and Rhodococcus equi in the latest edition of Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (L. monocytogenes is described as CAMP test negative with R. equi) and routine findings (positive reactions are usually described in many laboratories) make it advisable to review the current interpretation of the CAMP test to avoid confusion among people working in microbiological laboratories. Overall, 98.4% of the L. monocytogenes strains examined in this study, regardless of their source or the intensity of their hemolytic activity, displayed a synergic hemolytic reaction (CAMP phenomenon) with R. equi, indicating that L. monocytogenes can generally be considered CAMP positive with R. equi. We propose that L. monocytogenes, together with Listeria ivanovii, should be considered CAMP test positive with R. equi (circular or racket and semicircular or shovel shapes, respectively).
|
| 3670 | Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology "Minutes of the Meeting, 5 September 1986, Manchester, United Kingdom." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1987) 37:85-87. (Note: rejection of proposal by Jones & Seeliger (1983) for new type strain) |
| 3669 | Wayne, L.G. "Actions of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology on requests for opinions published in1983 and 1984." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1986) 36:357-358. [No PubMed record available.] |
| 3668 | Jones, D., and Seeliger, H.P.R. "Designation of a new type strain for Listeria monocytogenes. Request for an opinion." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1983) 33:429. [No PubMed record available.] |